A high-concept proposal called Future Combat Systems aimed to make all U.S. The Ground Combat Vehicle is pretty much the opposite of the original plan to replace the Bradley. ![]() (By contrast, the Bradley got heavier as the Army added armor to it in Iraq, and its original engine wasn’t powerful enough to support the extra weight.) Finally, the GCV’s extra weight means it will need to be manufactured from the start with a more powerful engine. Another reason the GCV is so huge is that it’s required to carry a larger gun than the Bradley does the new tank will hold a 30mm cannon, probably the 344-pound Mk44 Bushmaster II. The extra space also helps distribute pressure from the blast and thus lessens its impact. Part of logic behind the new tank’s massive size is that soldiers inside a vehicle are more likely to survive an explosion if there’s adequate space for them to wear armor while seated. But the military has built the new GCV to withstand a kind of threat that didn’t exist when the Bradley was deployed in the early 1980s: improvised explosive devices. Both vehicles will provide covering fire and damage enemy tanks. The Bradley is designed to carry a six-man squad (and three-man driving crew) into combat, while the GCV will carry a larger, nine-man squad. ![]() At 84 tons, the Ground Combat Vehicle prototype weighs more than twice as much as its predecessor, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle. Heavy does not even begin to describe the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |